Facebook’s digital currency project Libra faces mounting setbacks as Vodafone, the British telecommunications giant, has become the latest partner to withdraw from the initiative.
In an official statement, Vodafone said: “Vodafone Group has decided to withdraw from the Libra Association. We have said from the outset that Vodafone’s desire is to make a genuine contribution to extending financial inclusion. We remain fully committed to that goal and feel that we can make the most contribution by focusing our efforts on M-Pesa. We will continue to monitor the development of the Libra Association and do not rule out the possibility of future cooperation.”
Interest in digital currencies has accelerated since the rise of Bitcoin. Bitcoin is increasingly viewed as a modern store of value, yet it remains unlikely to be widely used by everyday consumers for routine purchases.
One key obstacle to everyday use of Bitcoin is slow transaction processing and limited scalability. Layer-two solutions, such as the Lightning Network, aim to address transaction speed and cost, but they introduce trade-offs that can affect decentralization and security.
Most digital currencies operate on blockchains, which face a well-known “trilemma”: scalability, security, and decentralization are difficult to achieve simultaneously. Bitcoin’s strength lies in security and strong decentralization, features that appeal in a world of geopolitical uncertainty, censorship concerns, and currency manipulation.
For everyday users, the priority is fast, inexpensive, and adequately secure transactions—especially for small purchases like coffee. Some digital currencies, such as Ripple, attract criticism from cryptocurrency purists for being more centralized, yet they often meet the practical needs of typical consumers.
Libra was designed as a more centralized digital currency similar in some respects to Ripple, aiming to leverage Facebook’s vast global user base for rapid adoption and scalability.
Initially, several major payment and commerce partners joined Libra, including Visa, PayPal, Mastercard, and eBay. However, soon after Facebook released the Libra whitepaper, the project drew intense regulatory scrutiny. Under pressure, many of those founding partners ultimately withdrew.
At the same time, central banks are actively exploring their own digital currencies to realize benefits such as faster cross-border payments and lower transaction costs. Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are likely to be presented as regulated, centralized alternatives to decentralized cryptocurrencies, and governments could encourage broad public adoption.
China is widely reported to be among the first major economies testing a central bank digital currency. The country already has extensive mobile payment adoption through platforms like WeChat Pay and Alipay, and a digital yuan would further institutionalize cashless transactions. If China moves forward with a CBDC, other major economies, including the United States, are expected to pursue similar paths.
Regulators and central banks elsewhere are also taking action. For example, the Bank of England announced it is exploring the potential for a central bank digital currency and is coordinating with peers including the Bank of Canada, the Bank of Japan, the European Central Bank, Sveriges Riksbank, and the Swiss National Bank.
While the broader shift toward digital currencies appears increasingly likely, Libra’s future has grown more uncertain as partners depart and regulatory hurdles persist.
Interested in hearing industry leaders discuss topics like this and learn about real-world use cases? Attend events from the co-located IoT Tech Expo, Blockchain Expo, AI & Big Data Expo, Cyber Security & Cloud Expo, and 5G Expo World Series, with upcoming conferences in Silicon Valley, London, and Amsterdam to explore the future of enterprise technology.