The FCC is preparing for a vote aimed at restoring federal net neutrality protections and reclaiming regulatory authority over internet service providers (ISPs) that was removed in 2017. Net neutrality seeks to ensure that users’ choices, rather than ISP preferences, determine how online services perform and succeed.
In early April, the commission published draft rules that have drawn both praise and concern. Among the notable provisions is a ban on mobile carriers—such as T‑Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon—reducing video quality for mobile subscribers. The draft also affirms support for state-level net neutrality laws, like California’s, and imposes tighter controls to prevent ISPs from circumventing net neutrality at network entry points.
However, the proposal has provoked controversy by allowing a framework in which mobile ISPs could prioritise certain applications via so-called “fast lanes,” potentially delivering consistently better performance for those apps, especially during periods of network congestion.
Mobile providers are already experimenting with forms of network slicing that could create these prioritised paths. Under the draft rules, application providers would not be charged for receiving prioritized treatment, but critics warn that allowing ISPs to select and prioritise apps still conflicts with core net neutrality principles.
Opponents say ISP-controlled fast lanes would limit user choice, skew competition, disadvantage startups, and reinforce the dominance of major platforms. Net neutrality advocates argue the internet should be an open and level playing field where user decisions—not ISP gatekeeping—determine which services thrive. They maintain that any prioritisation, whether explicit or implicit, undermines that ideal.
Permitting fast lanes could advantage large, established applications while marginalising smaller services that contribute to the internet’s diversity. The draft order’s tolerance for differentiated treatment—often framed as “fast lanes” and “slow lanes”—has prompted concern from legal experts, public interest groups, and technology advocates, many of whom call on the FCC to issue a final rule that clearly prohibits such prioritisation.
This debate highlights the FCC’s central role in protecting a fair digital environment and the importance of adopting explicit rules that prevent both overt and subtle forms of content prioritisation by ISPs.
With the commission scheduled to vote on 25 April 2024, the technology community and internet users are watching closely for a decision that could reshape net neutrality policy in the United States.
(Photo by Nareeta Martin)
See also: T-Mobile staff receiving cash offers to help with SIM swap attacks
Unified Communications is a two-day event held in California, London, and Amsterdam that explores the future of workplace collaboration in a digital world. The event runs alongside industry conferences covering digital transformation, IoT, edge computing, intelligent automation, AI & big data, and cybersecurity and cloud technologies.
Discover other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge.